Q % 4. 28 0 obj 36 0 Td (14)Tj T* endstream (22)Tj (4)Tj Nearly all, if not all, documents in Plaintiff's files would thus "reflect" some such verbatim statement because to some degree the documents contain information derived from verbatim statements. T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 44 0 obj endobj By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. /TT0 9.96 Tf -139.67 -24 Td /TT0 8.03 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 102.9337315 216.752748 cm If the request would take an unreasonable amount of time or money to fulfill in relation to the reasonable needs of the case (proportionality), recite specific, persuasive facts that explain why, preferably in an affidavit. T* endobj [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. /Parent 15 0 R T* >> T* [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)]TJ Plaintiff will make available for inspection at Plaintiff's offices responsive documents. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm >> 44.89 0 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm /Resources 47 0 R )Tj f /TT0 9.96 Tf )Tj T* 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.160446 -39.599996 cm >> )-1839.167 (A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-150 (t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( )-149.1 (M)-1.1 (ons)-1.8 (a)4.8 (nt)-2 (o )-149.9 (ha)13.9 (s )-151.8 (not)-2 ( )-150.9 (c)3.9 (on)10 (duc)14 (ted )-148.9 (a)4.8 ( )-139.9 (c)3 (hr)3 (on)-9 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 ( )-150 (t)-1.9 (oxi)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-119.9 (s)-10.1 (t)-2.9 (ud)-19.1 (y)19 ( )-129.9 (o)-10 (f)3.8 ( )-160.8 (a)3.9 (n)-19 (y)19 ( )-149 (of)2.9 ( )-150.8 (t)-1.1 (he)3 ( )]TJ For example, a goal is revenue and an objective is launching a new product to achieve revenue. ET [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ EMC (21)Tj T* 62 0 obj Plaintiff further objects to this request as duplicative and burdensome to the extent that it calls for documents already produced to Defendant in response to Defendant's February 2, 1999 Request for Documents, including but not limited to transcripts of depositions of third parties and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. endobj The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. Plaintiff objects to each document request to the extent that it calls for production of a privilege log for internal documents of Plaintiff. 58 0 obj [(e)4 (va)4.8 (l)-2.7 (ua)4.7 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (be)2.8 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (g)9.9 ( done)4 ( b)-10.7 (y)20.7 ( )-9.9 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (o dur)2 (in)-12.8 (g)10.7 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.1 ( 1)-9.9 (991 t)-2 (hr)2.9 (oug)10 (h 2017 p)-9.9 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (i)-1.1 (od )-10.8 (i)-2 (nvol)-1.2 (vi)-2 (ng)9.1 ( a)4.8 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ The serving party must file its motion to compel in the court where compliance is required. )]TJ /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] T* umass amherst softball roster. 1 0 obj (24)Tj endobj T* [(S)-3.1 (E)-3.9 (T)-3 ( N)1.9 (O)-1.9 (. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.5065 86.2909 Tm /Filter /FlateDecode /TT0 12 Tf [(C)-2.1 (a)3 (li)-4 (f)2 (or)3 (ni)-1.9 (a)3.9 ( but)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (n t)-2 (he)3 ( U)2 (ni)-1.9 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (d S)-2.8 (t)-2 (a)3 (te)1.1 (s,)-2 (\224)2.9 ( a)4.9 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-2.8 (e)4.8 ( de)3.1 (a)4 (dl)-1.9 (i)-2 (ne)4 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (e)3.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (nde)3.1 (d b)-19 (y)9.9 ( 10 c)4 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (e)4 (nda)-5.1 (r)2.1 ( da)-16 (y)20.8 (s)-1.8 (\))3.8 (. [1] 93.96 0 Td (20)Tj >> (28)Tj ET 36 0 Td 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. )Tj Furthermore, Civil Investigative Demand 13009 was issued to Dentsply, not to third parties. T* Q -177.12 -24 Td /Oslash /Ugrave /Uacute /Ucircumflex /Udieresis /Yacute /Thorn /germandbls /agrave /aacute 30 0 obj -36 -24 Td /TT1 12 Tf /Fm0 Do /Type /Page Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it calls for Plaintiff to reproduce, in narrative answer format, material from third parties that has already been produced to defendant. 67.32 0 Td [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ BT 29.4 648.61 Td /Parent 14 0 R Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. T* >> In addition, such materials often summarize the reasons the Division conducted the interview, characterize the importance of the information learned in the interview, draw inferences based on that information, describe the author's impressions concerning the cooperativeness, credibility, or knowledge of the interviewee, and/or identify potential areas of further inquiry. /TT1 12 Tf (10)Tj . 51.12 0 Td (4)Tj (10)Tj Q T* T* )2 (11)2 ( in )9.1 (P)-4.8 (l)-2 (a)14 (i)-1.9 (n)10.7 (t)7.1 (i)8.9 (f)2.2 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)3.2 (nd S)6 (up)9.9 (ple)11 (men)11.9 (t)-1.9 (a)3 (l )7.9 (R)-3.8 (e)14 (que)4.8 (s)8.1 (t)8.9 (s )-1.8 (f)1.1 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( )]TJ (9)Tj Plaintiff's Reply Also Objections To Defendant's Second Requirement ForDocuments And First Set The Interrogatories . 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.595 75.2636 Tm (4)Tj ET f Q 5. stream
endobj 4 0 obj /Parent 15 0 R T* stream
Plaintiff further objects to this request, whether broadly or more narrowly construed, to the extent it seeks production of documents protected by the work product doctrine, the governmental deliberative process privilege, or the attorney-client privilege. >> T* (18)Tj )]TJ /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] (3. [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. << -72 -24 Td ET (21)Tj /Annots [] -36 -24 Td (28)Tj T* << /Annots [] /Subtype /HF 26 0 obj See my blog " Make Sure you are aware of the New Document Response Requirements" for an updated analysis. << T* /Kids [42 0 R 43 0 R] q /Font 135 0 R 3. /TT0 12 Tf Software. Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 was not an investigation, it was a document request. [( t)-2 (ha)4 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.7 ( c)3.2 (i)-1.9 (t)-1.2 (e)3.1 (d doc)4 (um)-1.9 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (a)3.8 ( f)3 (or)2.1 (mal a)-6 (ge)3.9 (nc)-15.9 (y)19 ( de)-5 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (m)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on of)2 ( EPA. Interview memoranda of the Antitrust Division, however, and notes of such interviews are protected from discovery by the work product doctrine. x+ |
(6. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. See my blog Make Sure you are aware of the New Document Response Requirementsfor an updated analysis. q BT In reviewing the response, it is likely you are focusing in on the fact that there are garbage objections to your request and that you werent provided a privilege log. A request for such a log is unreasonable and unduly burdensome in light of the work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, and other privileges protecting such internal documents from discovery. )Tj )]TJ GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. /Parent 8 0 R 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm /CropBox [0 0 612 792] f 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re This sample California request for production of documents is sent pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.010, et seq. * Not Reasonably Particularized C.C.P. Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, and unduly burdensome to the extent it asks Plaintiff to identify in detail "all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter." f [(t)-1.1 (um)-2 (or)2.9 (.\224)3.1 ( Mo)-1.6 (ns)-2.7 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ W n endobj endobj /Resources 71 0 R [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (nd gr)3.9 (ounds )-1.8 (t)-3.8 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (oul)-1.9 (d r)2.9 (e)3.1 (quire)4.9 ( t)-2.7 (h)-9.2 (e)3.9 ( e)3.1 (x)-9 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (usi)-4.9 (on f)3.8 (r)3 (om)-1.9 ( e)3 (vid)-2 (e)2 (nc)4.9 (e)4 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)-6 (n)-10 (y)20.8 ( st)-3.8 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (ment o)-10.9 (r)3.8 ( ot)-2.8 (he)4.8 (r)3 ( )]TJ T* W n [(19 i)-1.1 (n P)5 (l)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)8.9 (nt)8 (i)-2.8 (f)3.8 (f)13 (s)-1.7 (\222)3.7 ( A)12 (m)-2.7 (e)4.7 (nd)9.2 (e)14.8 (d a)4 (nd )10 (S)-4.7 (uppl)-2 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (e)4.7 (nt)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)3.8 ( )9.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-2.1 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()11.9 (J)-10.9 (u)9.9 (ne)4 ( 29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. T* /Annots [] -103.32 -24 Td C.C.P. /Encoding 17 0 R (23)Tj q Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ And then they dump thousands of documents on you with no rhyme or reason as to how they are organized. /Parent 15 0 R 0 -791.16 l 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re General Objections The Department objects to each Interrogatory and Request insofar as it seeks production or disclosure of documents that require PWD or Raftelis Financial Consultants ("RFC") to undertake an extensive search for information not within its control or custody. (5)Tj )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ (27)Tj 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R]
3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. [(A)2 (m)-2 (e)4 (n)9.9 (de)4 (d)10 ( )-199 (a)3.1 (nd )10.8 (S)5.2 (upp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.7 (a)13.9 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)13.9 (que)14 (st)7 (s )-1.8 (f)2 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)6 (i)-1.9 (ons \()1.8 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, )9.1 (2017\))13 (])-6 (. Common objections to requests for production or inspection include: The request is overly broad or unduly burdensome. (22)Tj [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o t)-1.1 (he)3.1 ( e)4.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 ( pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( de)4 (m)-2 (a)3.9 (nds )-1.8 (M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-2.8 (o r)3.8 (e)4 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (d )-1.8 (prior)1.2 ( t)-11.9 (o t)-2 (he)4 ( )]TJ T* A response to a document request or interrogatory stating that objections and/or indicating that documents will be produced shall not be deemed or construed that there are, in fact, responsive documents, that Plaintiff performed any of the acts described in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory, or that Plaintiff acquiesces in the characterization of the conduct or activities contained in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory. The Southern District of New York again illustrates the point. T* -6 -24 Td /Names 3 0 R /GS0 gs BT T* Continue Reading WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE. 2. /ModDate (D:20190128141404-08'00') T* )]TJ [(D)1.1 (E)-2 (N)1.8 (IE)-4.8 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf Document Type: Full - Miscellaneous. With that in mind, the court announced that from now on in cases before this Court, any discovery response that does not comply with Rule 34s requirement to state objections with specificity (and to clearly indicate whether responsive material is being withheld on the basis of the objection) will be deemed a waiver of all objections (except as to privilege). [Emphasis added.]. (3. /TT1 12 Tf 44.75 0 Td ( )Tj q [(m)-1.1 (i)-2 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 a)4.8 (nd 404)-9.9 (1 of)2.1 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( hi)-2 (g)10.8 (h)-10.7 (-)2.9 (dose)2.8 (, a)4 (nd m)-12.8 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (e)4.7 ( 3023 of)3 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (d-)2.9 (dose)1.3 ( )-9.9 (g)9.9 (r)3 (oup)-9.1 (\224)3.9 ( a)3.2 (nd )]TJ (10)Tj /Annots [] In its Response to Document Request No. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 321.945 660 Td 5. -411.35 -24 Td [(1)-1.296 ( )]TJ /Type /Page Work product. /Type /Page Below is a list of scenarios with the applicable statutes and case law regarding the different responses you may, Recently I was contacted by an attorney who asked. REQUESTED DISCOVERY IS NOT CRITICAL TO PROVING THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OR DEFENSES /TT1 12 Tf T* trey parker house kauai; mccormick and schmick's prosecco sangria recipe; katherine bouris wife; Payroll Services. >> T* << 0 0 612 792 re california discovery objections, request for production. T* by Practical Law Litigation Maintained California A Practice Note explaining how to draft and serve a response to a request for production of documents (RFP) (also called an "inspection demand" or "document request") in a California unlimited civil action. q stream
(5. /Artifact <>BDC q endobj -73.07 -24 Td T* T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.995 679.0819 Tm (7)Tj 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.5293 75.2636 Tm [(a)4 (ppe)4.8 (a)4 (r)2.1 (e)4.9 (d )9.1 (onc)14.1 (og)9.9 (e)4 (ni)-1.9 (c)13.9 (. BT 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm Q (19)Tj [(a)4 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.9 (n)-20 (y)20 ( t)-2 (i)-2 (m)-2 (e)4 ( a)4.8 (nd f)3 (or)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)4 (so)-1.8 (n,)-1.8 ( t)-3.8 (o r)2.9 (e)3.2 (vi)-2 (se)2.9 (, su)-1.8 (pp)-1.8 (l)-3 (e)4 (m)-12 (e)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (, c)3.9 (or)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (, a)4.8 (dd t)-2.8 (o, or)3.8 ( )-9.9 (c)3 (l)-1.9 (a)-5.1 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (f)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (h)-10 (e)3 (se)2.3 ( R)-2.9 (e)3.8 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)4.8 (s.)-11.8 ( )]TJ q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm %PDF-1.7 endstream [(onc)4 (oge)4.8 (ni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( i)-1.9 (n m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (e)3.2 ( )-9.1 (pr)2.9 (oduc)3.1 (in)-12.9 (g)10.8 ( a)3.1 ( dose)-6.8 (-)2 (r)3 (e)4.9 (l)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-11.9 (e)3.1 (d )-10 (i)-2 (nc)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.1 (a)4.9 (s)-10.9 (e)3 ( in)-2 ( re)5 (na)4.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2.9 (ubul)-2 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (a)-6.9 (de)4.8 (nom)-1.9 (a)3.9 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.3 ( r)-6.1 (a)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ Such documents include notes of Plaintiff's attorneys and staff and draft and final internal memoranda of Plaintiff, including, but not limited to, interview memoranda, status memoranda, and recommendation memoranda. endobj These responses and objections are made without prejudice to, and are not a waiver of, Plaintiff's right to rely on other facts or documents at trial. endobj /Type /Page q /Artifact <>BDC T* -242.633 -24 Td pD1visp[n5pL3lQtM;-a-VO}]ny]t;pcgj(q =vwVB~dm$ 4H^~#Ead4*KSj:sLGLvBSHr$$UKe;vtT='l6tdfIKq5'H=l#?JzT=A?qjf)$d?RTia&p%NoD]FYD/}@J!>1Za{JZ:LigFmhHgSLI a^xrJgr,6l_. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.1952 679.0819 Tm T* q >> 0 -24 TD -9.349 -24 Td 44.77 0 Td (17)Tj EMC f /Length 13 0 R ( )Tj -72 -24 Td Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks documents or information that are readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, from documents or information in Defendant's possession, or from documents or information that Defendant previously produced to Plaintiff. T* Unlike Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(e)(1) (2), California law does not impose a continuing duty on a party to supplement their interrogatory or document responses. -73.07 -24 Td T* 2. [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ << (7. (9)Tj Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiffs possession custody or control. Attendance at such interviews was limited to, at most, the interviewee, Antitrust Division attorneys and staff, counsel for the interviewee (in some interviews), and a potential testifying expert economist (in some interviews). (20)Tj -72 -24 Td [(l)-1.1 (i)-2 (st)-4.9 (e)4.8 (d a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (No)2 (. To)2 ( t)-10.7 (he)3.9 ( e)4.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( su)-1.8 (gg)8.9 (e)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (t)-3 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 (r)-7.7 (e)4.7 ( w)2 (a)3.2 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (r)-6.2 (e)3.1 (se)2.1 (a)4.8 (r)-7.7 (c)4.7 (h or)3 ( )]TJ x%0>7P{oE%1D Q [(i)-1.1 (f)2.1 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (st)-4.7 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. T* q 332.51 0 Td 31 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 96.837 -24 Td >> -78.23 -24 Td 45 0 obj 3, Plaintiff requested that Defendant: "Identify and produce a complete copy of any and all written or official certification of Defendant Lugo receiving or being issue training and/or supervision regarding (CSP-LAC) written policy and procedure issuing out loss of privilege from January 16, 2014 to December 31, 2019." )9.1 ( )]TJ /Rotate 0 T* /TT1 12 Tf /PageMode /UseNone 36 -24 Td /Annots [] Improve lighting insulation by installing lightning arrestors in the last phase of the project. 35 0 obj /Font 129 0 R /Resources 55 0 R . Objectives are steps towards goals. T* (5)Tj >> 67.32 0 Td /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Is it when they serve their written response with an assertedprivilege, or when they produce documents? /Author () Q Judith M. Kinney (DSB # 3643) Assistant United States Attorney 1201 Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-6277, This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. /Type /Catalog )-50.7 (25 )-59.2 (i)-2 (n )-40 (P)5 (l)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)8 (nt)8.9 (i)-2.8 (f)3.8 (f)13 (s\222)1.1 ( )-50.8 (A)11.9 (men)11.9 (d)10 (e)4 (d )-50.8 (a)4.8 (n)9.1 (d )-39 (S)-4.9 (u)10.8 (pp)10 (l)-2.8 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (n)9.1 (t)-1.9 (a)4.8 (l)-2.8 ( )]TJ /florin /fraction /guilsinglleft /guilsinglright /minus /perthousand /quotedblbase /quotedblleft /quotedblright /quoteleft endobj /Kids [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R] 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.0332519 -39.599996 cm (11)Tj ^ci|kFC5iCPTZGhG9#cvwz&>2/DxHI4l
zl}RtvNM,rru-mIi1n.~,aX2l:Kz pKbQ}"nDo,4noiI[6Qv,m, ,%}?T\8
Y
Xem)f,]jmGnVYye^|lY5j2)_`gG<7fGyjW$6]k@ MB-Mm~S-O$
pUxqHCxPiJSN Plaintiffs object that the Request seeks documents that are work product, attorney-client communications, and/or documents that are protected under Rule 26(b)(4), including draft reports and communications between Plaintiffs' attorneys and the expert witness. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBJECTIONS, TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET NO. Dont say if anything is being withheld on the basis of the objection. 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm [(pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( pur)2.9 (por)3.9 (t)-2.7 (s)-1.1 ( t)-2 (o de)4.8 (f)3 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (e)3 ( t)-1.8 (he)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( b)-20.8 (y)20.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (i)-2.9 (n)-9.1 (g)9 ( a)4.9 ( f)2.2 (i)-1.1 (v)-10.9 (e)4 (-)3.8 (pa)-6.7 (g)9.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (a)3.9 (c)3.1 (k)-9 (gr)2.9 (ound doc)3.1 (u)-9.9 (m)-2 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-3.7 ( )]TJ 48 0 Td T* T* -73.07 -24 Td /Kids [24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R /TT0 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf ( )Tj 29 0 obj Q (2)Tj x[oJr)7 y$r$ YyAYO=_lr>$@lvWI}(PMYwUeM^u[|Qc]|,Wst]y_Uk]]5e]^./C+xYUnjw_ ZwjovxN4rE 7e];)c]vQB{g+Uf]uoOo;cpf~.}"nDz NUjK{UVMyuS,_,\_/%bwiG}eauS^B`Cc[^|+/>,1 F"H#wH~-Iu?[R /Fm0 Do q /Resources 79 0 R /TT0 12 Tf ET 44.75 0 Td << /Rotate 0 T* /XObject 152 0 R Q 168.288 -24 Td P)-4.7 (ur)3.7 (su)-1.8 (a)3 (nt)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o )-10 (t)-2 (he)3.1 ( C)-2.1 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (f)2.1 (or)2.9 (ni)-1.8 (a)3.9 ( C)-3 (ode)4.8 ( )]TJ [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( EP)-1.2 (A )2 (i)9.9 (nf)3 (or)13 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (d Mo)7.2 (nsa)12.1 (nt)8.9 (o on J)-11.8 (ul)-12 (y)29.9 ( )30.9 (29, 1)-10 (985, t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (a)2 (f)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( E)11 (P)-4.8 (A)1.9 (\222)13 (s )]TJ Service Provider. /TT0 8.03 Tf /Resources 107 0 R -72 -24 Td stream
q Official websites use .gov It went like this: I read your article Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, and filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Preliminary Statement and Unmeritorious Objections. The Preliminary Statement contained many of the issues you pointed out in your article, and each of defendants responses to interrogatories and document requests contained the same 28 lines of objections. 3 0 obj T* ( )Tj /TT1 12 Tf To the extent that "during" is intended to mean "at the time of," Plaintiff objects to this definition as overbroad because it would call for materials unrelated to this action. << (2)Tj T* q Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, or control. T* (8)Tj [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on c)3.9 (onc)3.1 (l)-1.9 (ude)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (na)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-9 (a)3.9 (de)3.2 (nom)-2 (a)4 (s)-10.1 ( f)2.9 (ound i)-1.9 (n t)-2.9 (he)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (d-)3.8 ( a)3.1 (nd hig)7.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.8 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (g)9.1 (r)3.8 (oup )]TJ (25)Tj (16)Tj T* ET This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. /Filter /FlateDecode Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing objections, Plaintiff will produce the documents responsive to this request that have not already been produced and are not protected by the privileges listed above. Q 51.12 0 Td endobj will be included in the production."] 2 "A statement that the party to whom a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling has been directed will comply with the particular demand shall state that the production, inspection, copying, testing, or sampling, and related activity demanded, will be allowed either in whole or in part, and . [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ T* Prevent flooding in the community by building gabions and digging trenches by the last phase of the project. -102.276 -24 Td . /Length 142 0 R [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (ons,)-2 ( M)-3 (onsanto )]TJ stream
The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections. -109.44 -48 Td Interview memoranda of the Antitrust Division, however, notes of such interviews, and attorney and staff recollections of such interviews are protected from discovery by the work product doctrine. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 101.3938755 107.661828 cm OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS. /Type /Page (27)Tj 36 -24 Td T* (1. -394.07 -24 Td Q /Parent 15 0 R << /Parent 8 0 R )]TJ [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (ndum)-1.8 ( )]TJ
T* 0.71 -791.16 l X/g. Q )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ )]TJ 47.77 0 Td T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm [(S)-10.8 (e)3.9 (e)4.9 ( )]TJ
See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3); Hickman v. Taylor 329 U.S. 495 (1947). )-10.7 ( Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ ( )Tj -48.829 -12 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.677 86.2909 Tm endobj (12)Tj T* /DR 12 0 R q In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. The failure to include any general objection in any specific response does not waive any general objection to that request. x+ |
endobj )]TJ [(t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (s )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.9 (que)3.2 (st)-3.9 ( )10.8 (a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (wr)5 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (n. Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ [(a)4 (de)4.8 (nom)-2.8 (a)4.8 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.2 ( )-9.8 (r)3.7 (a)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (um)-2.9 (or)3.8 (, i)-2.7 (n a)4.7 ( dose)1.3 (-)3 (r)-6.1 (e)3 (late)3 (d m)-1.9 (a)4.8 (nn)-9.9 (e)3.1 (r)2.9 (. Typically, if you requested a document, but the other side claims it doesn't exist, you can object to the judge if they try to introduce the document at trial. 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.594463 -39.599996 cm )]TJ /TT0 11.03 Tf
endobj /Metadata 7 0 R T* W n [(a)4 (nd 4041 of)3.8 ( t)-2.8 (he)4.8 ( hi)-11.9 (g)9.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.7 (e)3.9 (, a)4.8 (nd m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( 3023 of)2.2 ( t)-2 (h)-10 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (m)-2 (i)-2 (d-)2.9 (dose)1.2 ( gr)3 (oup\224)4.9 ( a)4 (nd t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t)-11.9 ( \223)4.8 (G)2 (l)-11.9 (y)19 (phos)-10.7 (a)4.7 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( w)-8.7 (a)4.7 (s )]TJ Near the end of discovery, it is wise to send out a more case-specific . x+ |
/Type /Page Here is the first one. Thus, these materials were created and maintained in a manner consistent with maintaining the protections afforded work product. Andrew Felser is with Felser, PC, in Denver, Colorado. ET /TT0 12 Tf endobj /Length 156 0 R -72 -24 Td << /Contents [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] Publicly available documents including, but not limited to, newspaper clippings, court papers, and documents available on the Internet, will not be produced. 44.87 0 Td f endstream T* /TT0 9.96 Tf << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /TT2 12 Tf /Length 137 0 R 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re CCP, which can be used in other jurisdictions as well. (22)Tj /ITXT (2.1.7) (27)Tj /TT1 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm T* T* /ExtGState 133 0 R /Rotate 0 2. /TT0 12 Tf << how to prove . T* >> /Title () Q /TT1 12 Tf Plaintiff further objects to this request to the extent that it relies upon the terms "statement" and "third parties." /Resources 123 0 R OBJECTIONS: Relevance. Your membership has expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits. [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ (6)Tj (6)Tj 49.55 0 Td /Type /Page 4. /TT0 12 Tf /igrave /iacute /icircumflex /idieresis /eth /ntilde /ograve /oacute /ocircumflex /otilde T* (7)Tj 8 0 obj )]TJ -29.975 -24 Td ET OBJECTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS. [(G)7.1 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (E)-2.9 (R)1.9 (A)2 (L)-2.9 ( O)-1.2 (B)-2.9 (JE)-3.9 (C)2.7 (T)-3.7 (IO)-4 (N)1.9 (S)]TJ Continue Reading DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONSWhat is Wrong with this Document Response? )-10.8 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ T* endstream q T* ET /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] T* Plaintiff objects to producing these duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and case files. /Contents [108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R] . /TT1 12 Tf (18)Tj (20)Tj /TT1 12 Tf 20 0 obj >> Q q uuid:6655538f-926d-4155-9895-cad3e0717c55 /Fm0 Do Plaintiff objects to Definition No. 4 0 obj f /TT1 12 Tf Call Us Today! 1, which also used this undefined term, Plaintiff used "contain, include, or are derived from" as the equivalent of "reflecting" in an attempt to read the request broadly. 65.4 648.61 Td Q T* >> 59 0 obj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm f /Font 147 0 R T* Plaintiff obtained any responsive information, other than the information that Defendant may derive from the materials described in the preceding paragraphs, from interviews of individuals by attorneys and staff of Plaintiff. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm Plaintiff incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth below. endobj /Count 14 /Parent 14 0 R /Font 18 0 R Q /DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g ) << /Annots [] << (9)Tj >> /Annots [] /Type /Page 65 0 obj Continue Reading Avoiding the Technical Mistakes When Drafting Written Discovery. /odieresis /divide /oslash /ugrave /uacute /ucircumflex /udieresis /yacute /thorn /ydieresis] x%0>7P{Reu1D GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1.
What Does Healing Ringworm Look Like In Cats,
Irving Park And Mannheim Road Accident,
Articles S